The Overprescribing of Psychotropic Medications

Psychotropic medications, such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers, have revolutionized the field of mental health by providing effective treatment options for individuals with psychiatric disorders. However, there are concerns regarding the overprescribing of these medications, requiring a critical examination of the underlying factors and potential consequences.

One of the primary causes of the overprescribing of psychotropic medications lies in the diagnostic process. Mental health conditions are complex and heterogeneous, often presenting with overlapping symptoms and diagnostic challenges. In some cases, healthcare providers may rely heavily on medication as a first-line treatment option without thoroughly considering alternative approaches, such as therapy or lifestyle modifications. The pressure to quickly alleviate symptoms, limited access to psychotherapy services, and the influence of pharmaceutical marketing can contribute to the inclination to prescribe medications excessively.

Pharmaceutical marketing also plays a significant role in the overprescribing of psychotropic medications. The aggressive marketing strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies can influence healthcare providers' prescribing practices. The promotion of new medications and the provision of incentives, such as indirect financial benefits, may sway prescribing decisions, potentially leading to an increased reliance on psychotropic medications. This marketing-driven culture has contributed to the overprescribing phenomenon.

Another factor contributing to the overprescribing of psychotropic medications is the lack of comprehensive and accessible non-pharmacological treatment options. While psychotropic medications can be effective in managing symptoms, they do not address the root causes of mental health conditions. Psychotherapy and other non-pharmacological approaches are vital components of successful mental health care. However, limited access to these services, long waiting lists, and insurance barriers can result in an overreliance on medications as a primary treatment modality.

The consequences of overprescribing psychotropic medications are multifaceted. Patients may experience adverse effects, including weight gain, sexual dysfunction, sedation, or increased risk of metabolic disorders. Furthermore, prolonged use of psychotropic medications without periodic reevaluation can lead to medication dependence, resulting in challenges when attempting to discontinue or reduce the dosage. Overprescribing can also contribute to the medicalization of normal human experiences, potentially diminishing the focus on addressing psychosocial factors and promoting self-care strategies.

Addressing the issue of overprescribing psychotropic medications requires a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach. First and foremost, enhancing provider education and training is crucial. Healthcare professionals should receive better training in best practices, including appropriate diagnostic criteria, the use and limitations of medications, the integration of non-pharmacological interventions, and finally the process of deprescribing a medication when there is no clear benefits to its continued use.

Promoting a collaborative approach between healthcare providers and patients is equally important. Shared decision-making should be encouraged, allowing patients to actively participate in treatment planning and explore non-pharmacological options when appropriate. This approach fosters patient autonomy, encourages open communication, and helps align treatment goals with patients' preferences and values.

Notes on: Motorcycle Crash Shows Bioethicist The Dark Side Of Quitting Opioids Alone

I heard the interview on NPR with Travis Rieder about a book he wrote called - In Pain: A Bioethicist's Personal Struggle With Opioids. (I have copied the transcript of the interview highlights at the end of this entry.) He is a bioethicist at Johns Hopkins University who sustained a serious injury to his foot that caused severe chronic pain. He was treated with opioids, but then could not find a doctor who could effectively and humanely taper him from them.

Unfortunately I have not yet had a chance to read his book. I’m very sorry to hear about his difficulties in obtaining effective treatment. I thought that as a doctor who specializes in treating comorbid chronic pain and chemical dependency I might share some of my insights into some of the structural obstacles to doctors providing good treatment. He mentioned that he felt that a lack of knowledge about pain treatment and chemical dependency was the root cause and posited that better education on the subjects would mitigate it. I believe that this is true to a certain extent, but it ignores the overpowering context in which medical practice takes place.

I am reminded of a quote from Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” The pervasive and deeply misguided application of manufacturing principles to achieve “efficiencies” and razor thin margins have forced doctors to see a volume of patients that preclude them from having a thoughtful approach to a patient’s problems. Combined with the ever expanding administrative burden placed on them, they cannot entertain time consuming issues. This is not because doctors are greedy or uncaring. They try to do the best that they can within the constraints forced upon them. Currently most doctors are employees of large entities that impose patient quotas on them and they have little control over the structure of their practice. This has degraded care to the point of total inadequacy for people with complex problems like chronic pain and/or chemical dependency.

The alternative to situations like this is for doctors, like I have done, to go into boutique private practices that do not accept any insurance payments. While this permits the space to practice high quality/low volume medicine, it is unaffordable for most people.

I believe that as long as these types of structural obstacles are in place, no amount of education will improve these things. It may only end up serving to reinforce the reductionist narratives that seemed to drive some of the experiences that he described.

Motorcycle Crash Shows Bioethicist The Dark Side Of Quitting Opioids Alone

July 8, 2019 3:44 PM ET Heard on Fresh Air

In 2015, Travis Rieder, a medical bioethicist with Johns Hopkins University's Berman Institute of Bioethics, was involved in a motorcycle accident that crushed his left foot. In the months that followed, he underwent six different surgeries as doctors struggled first to save his foot and then to reconstruct it.

Rieder says that each surgery brought a new wave of pain, sometimes "searing and electrical," other times "fiery and shocking." Doctors tried to mitigate the pain by prescribing large doses of opioids, including morphine, fentanyl, Dilaudid, oxycodone and OxyContin. But when it came time to taper off the drugs, Rieder found it nearly impossible to get good advice from any of the clinicians who had treated him.

"We called everybody, and a bunch of them wouldn't even talk to me," he says. "And this includes the pain management team. They would not speak with me, and the message they sent through a nurse was, 'We prescribe opioids but we don't help with tapering.' "

Rieder likens his experiences trying to get off prescription pain meds to a game of hot potato. "The patient is the potato," he says. "Everybody had a reason to send me to somebody else."

Eventually Rieder was able to wean himself off the drugs, but not before receiving bad advice and going through intense periods of withdrawal. He shares his insights as both a patient and a bioethicist in a new book, In Pain: A Bioethicist's Personal Struggle With Opioids.

On what happened when he tried tapering opioids after an ill-advised consultation with a plastic surgeon, who recommended abruptly reducing his dosage

He didn't know what he was talking about; that wasn't his area of expertise. He just tried to think of something that was reasonable — and he would eventually admit this, so this isn't too much editorializing — but we went home and the next day we dropped the first dose and it immediately sent me into withdrawal. ... It got worse over the first few days, and so we start to get really freaked out, because I feel like I've got the worst flu I've ever had multiplied by some order of magnitude. And I'm thinking, I have an entire month of this to get through. And so [my partner and I] get pretty freaked out.

On why it was so hard to find a doctor to help him taper opioids

I asked myself that question every day, every hour for a very long time. And once I transitioned from being an opioid patient to being an opioid researcher the answer I came to was something like "a lot of doctors don't know, so this is just a knowledge gap." So this is probably the best description of my plastic surgeon. He just had no idea how to do this. And that's understandable, because clinicians — doctors — don't get a lot of pain education in medical school. It's not required — a bunch of them get zero — and, on average, you only get a handful of hours. So there's a knowledge gap for sure.

On being sent to an addiction clinic

We called addiction clinics and they very nicely and very gently said, "Boy, you are not our job. We're dealing with people who might die from a heroin overdose anytime they get turned away. We're triaging here. You just took too many pain meds. You just need your prescriber to get you off them."

On the ways in which money plays a role in opioid use

Opioids are dirt cheap, because a bunch of them have been off patent for decades, and these other sorts of therapies can be really expensive. ... A lot of what I was supposed to do to help that pain was physical therapy. Physical therapy stopped getting coverage by my insurance when I turned over the new year. And I no longer hit my deductible, so it was too expensive. So I stopped. Because I was a relatively new faculty member — I couldn't afford it. And so I keep thinking, well, surely a bunch of other people would also struggle to pay for this.

So there are all of these different methods for handling pain that they could be arrows in the quiver of medicine, but they're hard. They get covered less. They're expensive. And so what do we know about opioids? Well, they're incredibly cheap. Morphine is a couple cents per dose. And they are easy. You give them to the patient, the patient feels better immediately. You give pills to a patient who comes in complaining about pain, they leave happy. So this really led me to investigate this, like, deep system of perverse incentives that have pushed us toward just prescribing opioids instead of doing something more integrative and holistic.

On how opioid dependence is treated as a medical issue, but heroin addiction is treated as a criminal issue

Now we're all very concerned about the opioid epidemic — when there have been people of color dying from heroin disproportionately for a really long time, and we just don't talk about it. And we treated them like criminals. That's a travesty. It's absolutely tragic. It's a stain on our response to drugs in this country. My story is not the only one that matters. Stories that look like mine aren't the only ones that matter. People take drugs for a reason. And whether you started with oxycodone or with heroin, if you were medicating something and it hurt you, and you ended up dying from overdose, your life matters. And we need to just kind of announce that loudly every time we have this conversation.

Opioid Agonist Therapy

In a perfect world, it would be wonderful if everyone could be abstinent without any medication. However, this is not often possible. In general, by the time patients come to see me, they have been unable to maintain any consistent sobriety, if any, on their own. Fortunately, there are now excellent medications to help patients recover from drug addiction.

Patients who abuse opioids eventually develop tolerance (need more of the drug to get the same effect) and functional impairment (e.g. fail out of school, lose their job, get arrested). One of the main goals in addiction and psychiatric treatment is to improve functional impairment – i.e. to help people “get their life together”.

Suboxone is a medication that can assist in the treatment of opioid dependence.  A controlled dose of Suboxone is given in place of the opioid being abused. In contrast to requiring escalating doses of the abused opioid, the patient is maintained on a stable dose of Suboxone. Instead of feeling intoxicated, patients feel “normal” when they are on the appropriate dose of replacement therapy.

Patients frequently ask if they will become addicted to Suboxone. Drug addiction is fundamentally different than physiologic medication dependence.  In the latter, the patient will develop a characteristic withdrawal syndrome if the drug is taken away.  Many, many, common medications that no one would ever associate with abuse have this feature. For example, if someone takes high blood pressure medication and suddenly stops taking it, their blood pressure will skyrocket to much higher levels than if they had never taken the medication. That is why it is important to taper most medications that you have been on for an extended period of time.

In contrast, drug addiction can basically be defined in that use of the drug causes functional impairment in multiple areas of a person’s life.  One can also be addicted to a drug, but not be physically dependent on it.  So, the answer is that the patient will become physically dependent on the drug, but will not be addicted to it.  Life will actually get better, as the patient will now be free of their maladaptive behaviors and resultant negative sequelae.
 

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT ADDICTION TREATMENT

1. People do not have to “hit bottom” in order to be motivated to start treatment and become abstinent. Many people that seek treatment still have intact jobs, families, and finances. They seek help before things become really bad.

2. It is not true that everyone with addiction has some sort of past trauma or psychiatric diagnosis that needs to be addressed or treated.

3. If present, it is essential to address and treat psychiatric diagnoses and symptoms in order to give patients the best chance of becoming abstinent.

4. Addiction has both a biological component, as well as a behavioral component. Medications can be used to treat the biological part, counseling and therapy are used to treat the behavioral aspect. This can be said of other medical illnesses. For example, diabetes can be treated with medications, along with lifestyle modifications such as weight loss by starting a healthy diet and exercise.

5. Using medications such as Suboxone to treat opioid (painkiller) addiction is not substituting one addiction for another. Addiction can be defined, in part, in terms of inability to stop drinking and using despite negative consequences and dysfunction in one’s life. Suboxone treats the biological part of addiction. It allows for the stable use of an opioid at a steady dose that is not intoxicating, and reverses dysfunction in one’s life – the exact opposite of addiction.

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT ADDICTION TREATMENT

People become abstinent in different ways:

1. Some do it on their own without any treatment – they just stop drinking or using.

2. Others become abstinent with free self-help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous or SMART Recovery. Paid outpatient group treatment is also another avenue for treatment.

3. One-on-one medical treatment with a physician who specializes in addictions is another way that people achieve abstinence.  Medical treatment in my practice involves outpatient detoxification (medically supervised withdrawal) if needed, the use of medications to help maintain abstinence (medication assisted treatment), along with addiction counseling and psychosocial support.

4. Some people initially require more intensive treatment. This would involve going away to a rehabilitation center for a month or longer. Sometimes it is necessary to remove someone from their drug using environment and lifestyle in order to allow them to start any type of treatment. Being immersed in treatment 24/7 is one of the benefits of being in a rehabilitation center.

5. The sad fact is that some people never become abstinent despite all different types of treatment. Just like other diseases, not everyone recovers